“I don’t have time for Facebook and Twitter”
By · Commentsby Mike Moran
Social media is free, but what’s the catch? Time. We only have so much time to spend putting our message out there, but we don’t want to limit how many people can hear what we have to say. This problem comes up in many ways, but the simplest is the dichotomy between Facebook and Twitter. Many folks decide to spend the bulk of their social time on one or the other, with relatively few people using both. If Google Buzz catches fire, this fragmentation might only increase. What’s a marketer to do?
Image by luc legay via Flickr
Let’s face it. There’s no real difference between “friends” and “followers,” nor between “”status updates” and “tweets.” And why would you decide to spend all your precious social media time updating one venue and not the other, if your customers use both of them? But how can you double the amount of time you spend in social media updating both?
You don’t have to. I decided that I prefer Twitter to Facebook so I have every tweet I send out mirrored as my Facebook status. And I do the same thing on LinkedIn. I haven’t taken the plunge on Google Buzz yet, but I’ll probably do the same thing there, also.
If someone wants to see what I am up to, they can use their favorite method to keep up and I only have to update once. I know people using FriendFeed to accomplish the same thing. In each of your social media lives, you can set up these mirrors to make sure that your customers can keep up no matter what network they are in, while you only need to update once.
Now, I find even though I update in only one place, that I still have trouble making time for more than a few tweets a day, but there isn’t anything I can do to help with that.
Be sure and visit our small business news site.
These days, local marketing can seem a lot more complicated to the average small business owner than it used to be—and for very good reason. With advances in digital offerings, small businesses are now confronted with a growing range of possibilities for their ad dollars. Moreover, owners are faced with the harder task of determining how to link their various initiatives into cohesive strategies that deliver the strongest rates of return for their businesses.
Since the start of the year, I’ve watched first-hand as several Yellow Pages companies in the U.S. and Canada have expanded and retooled their offerings in order to help small businesses overcome these types of obstacles.
Major players including SuperMedia, DexOne Corp., The Berry Company, and Yellow Pages Group have recently announced new services, partnerships, and acquisitions that provide their small business clients with the means to combine the most recent digital marketing possibilities with traditional print and online options that they’ve used for years.
When I say digital offerings, I’m not just referring to Internet Yellow Pages, which millions of small businesses already know and use. I’m also talking about new vertical web sites including digital coupon sites, shopping comparison sites and user review sites that are among the latest drivers of local leads and are increasingly being added to the portfolios of various Yellow Pages companies.
As recent statistics show, these sites are among the most popular and trusted destinations for online shoppers and present exciting opportunities for local businesses:
Digital coupon sites: Digital coupons, which provide users with discounted promotion codes for online products, are quickly becoming a regular part of the online shopping experience. Coupons allow small businesses to generate new business and online buzz about their offerings.
They’re popular—ranked among the most-utilized tools for online shoppers, second only to major search engines, according to Compete.com’s Online Shopper Intelligence Study released last month, Approximately 35% of U.S. online users surveyed said they visited coupon sites when shopping online.
They’re also proven to generate sales. About 20% of U.S. online users—or nearly 45 million consumers— used digital coupons in 2009, an increase of 18.4% from 38 million users in 2008, according to research compiled by Coupons.com. In January, coupon traffic measured more than 14 million users and generated $34 million in online sales, a study by coupon aggregator RetailMeNot.com found.
Shopping comparison sites: Shopping comparison sites allow users to browse a range of products sold by participating retailers and compare prices, features, seller ratings and reviews, and other indicators. These sites provide a new platform for small businesses to gain visibility and compete directly with local and national retailers based on facts—not who, for example, can outbid the other in purchasing key search engine keywords.
Approximately 80 million U.S. consumers use shopping comparison sites, according to the Compete.com study. The survey also found that 22% of online users said they visit a shopping comparison site when purchasing products online.
User review sites: User-generated review sites provide the first-hand experiences of past customers who have purchased services or products from local businesses. These sites, which including ratings and other features, allow small businesses to let their clients promote their offerings for them by sharing positive stories and recommending that others patronize their services
User review sites are well-trusted by consumers. In fact, consumer opinions posted online are among the most trusted forms of advertising, bested only by recommendations from people known, according to the Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey released in July 2009. Businesses gain credibility and can generate new business leads by supporting their presence on user review sites.
As these online destinations continue to grow, small businesses will be looking for advice on how best to promote their offerings. Our industry will need to live up to its important role of counseling local advertisers by providing details of how they can engage in this new digital marketplace.
searchengineland.com » Locals Only
Neg Norton
by Sage Lewis
Google is doing a test in the Houston market that is allowing small businesses to affordably stand out from their competition. Watch this video to learn how you could benefit from this.
Be sure and visit our small business news site.
The Fallacy of Search Engine Marketing Only
By · Commentsby Scott Buresh
Allow me to offer a pre-emptive caveat – I own a successful search engine marketing company. Like most businesses, we are constantly trying to expand our client base – primarily through using the same search engine and internet marketing methods that we deliver to our clients. A quick search on terms such as “search engine optimization company” or “internet marketing company” on Google will demonstrate that we practice what we preach. As I write this, on a “clean machine” (one with all browser settings reset and cookies removed), my search engine marketing company ranks number 1 on Google for both of these phrases and the plural forms of the phrases. Based upon your past search tendencies, your specific location, and whims of the Google Gods, your mileage may vary, but you should find us near the top of the SERPs for those and hundreds of other related terms.
The Value of Integrating Different Internet Marketing Methods
The point here is not to boast – these results are due to the collective efforts of my expert team, not solely my own expertise. The point is to back up my contention that we practice what we preach and that the vast majority of our leads come from the internet marketing methods we apply to our own site. However, there has been much debate over the years in the search engine marketing community about whether it is proper or even hypocritical for a search engine marketing company to use other forms of advertising unrelated to internet marketing. The naysayers generally have a common argument: a quality search engine marketing company “shouldn’t need” to engage in any forms of offline marketing. Depending on the goals one has for their search engine marketing company, this may actually be true for some. A smaller boutique firm or an independent consultant may have all the leads they ever want from their internet marketing methods. They may even be turning business away while they make blog posts about how companies such as mine shouldn’t need to look offline for additional business opportunities.
However, this again relates directly to goals. If a search engine marketing company has capacity even after they maximize their online leads, and their business plan calls for maximum growth, what is the issue with engaging in other forms of marketing? As long as other marketing channels provide an acceptable ROI, I do not buy the argument that you “shouldn’t need it,” no matter what your situation.
The metrics are obviously what are important. It has been our experience that our own internet marketing methods provide us with, by far, the highest ROI of any of our other marketing efforts. However, this does not mean that the ROI from our online marketing efforts constitutes the baseline for what is ACCEPTABLE in terms of a return. In fact, we have done the math, and we know that we can afford to pay much more per lead.
Or, to look at this another way, we often work with companies that are embarking upon online marketing for the first time. These companies almost always already have successful offline marketing campaigns in place (after all, they are successful businesses). They are obviously delighted when they discover that their cost per lead or cost per sale with internet marketing is much lower than their other marketing efforts – but does this mean that they decide to shut those other successful channels down? Of course not.
And do we, as a responsible search engine marketing company, advise them that they should shut down those channels and put all of their eggs in the online basket? Of course not. We just enjoy the fact that our internet marketing methods provide the best bang for their buck.
Nobody can deny that the advent of various internet marketing methods has been a game-changer. Some forms of traditional advertising may even be on their last legs. Trade show attendance is down. Magazines and newspapers are in decline. I can’t remember the last time a door-to-door salesperson came up to my house* (except those selling a particular religion – but that’s a different story).
However, some channels, in our experience, still can provide exceptional returns. Direct mail, done properly, still works for us. Channel partnerships with offline marketing businesses can be profitable. Offline PR, when done properly, provides our search engine marketing company with exceptional exposure and returns. As long as we are achieving acceptable margins on these endeavors, we will continue to use them. And I will continue to stand incredulous when I hear from those who tell me that we shouldn’t.
*Unless you count Girl Scouts peddling cookies.
Be sure and visit our small business news site.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=95522c66-21ea-44ce-bd85-e97151a11f09)

